首页> 外文OA文献 >Comparison of remote sensing and plant trait-based modelling to predict ecosystem services in subalpine grasslands
【2h】

Comparison of remote sensing and plant trait-based modelling to predict ecosystem services in subalpine grasslands

机译:遥感与基于植物性状的模型预测亚高山草原生态系统服务的比较

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

There is a growing demand for spatially explicit assessment of multiple ecosystem services (ES) and remote sensing (RS) can provide valuable data to meet this challenge. In this study, located in the Central French Alps, we used high spatial and spectral resolution RS images to assess multiple ES based on underpinning ecosystem properties (EP) of subalpine grasslands. We estimated five EP (green biomass, litter mass, crude protein content, species diversity and soil carbon content) from RS data using empirical RS methods and maps of ES were calculated as simple linear combinations of EP. Additionally, the RSbased results were compared with results of a plant trait-based statistical modelling approach that predicted EP and ES from land use, abiotic and plant trait data (modelling approach). The comparison between the RS and the modelling approaches showed that RS-based results provided better insight into the fine-grained spatial distribution of EP and thereby ES, whereas the modelling approach reflected the land use signal that underpinned trait-based models of EP. The spatial agreement between the two approaches at a 20-m resolution varied between 16 and 22% for individual EP, but for the total ecosystem service supply it was only 7%. Furthermore, the modelling approach identified the alpine grazed meadows land use class as areas with high values of multiple ES (hot spots) and mown-grazed permanent meadows as areas with low values and only few ES (cold spots). Whereas the RS-based hot spots were a small subset of those predicted by the modelling approach, cold spots were rather scattered, small patches with limited overlap with the modelling results. Despite limitations associated with timing of assessment campaigns and field data requirements, RS offers valuable data for spatially continuous mapping of EP and can thus supply RS-based proxies of ES. Although the RS approach was applied to a limited area and for one type of ecosystem, we believe that the broader availability of high fidelity airborne and satellite RS data will promote RS-based assessment of ES to larger areas and other ecosystems.
机译:对多种生态系统服务(ES)进行空间显式评估的需求不断增长,而遥感(RS)可以提供有价值的数据来应对这一挑战。在这项位于法国中部阿尔卑斯山的研究中,我们使用了高空间分辨率和光谱分辨率的RS图像,基于亚高山草原的基础生态系统特性(EP)评估了多个ES。我们使用经验RS方法从RS数据估计了五种EP(绿色生物量,凋落物质量,粗蛋白含量,物种多样性和土壤碳含量),ES的图被计算为EP的简单线性组合。此外,将基于RS的结果与基于植物性状的统计建模方法的结果进行了比较,该方法通过土地利用,非生物和植物性状数据预测了EP和ES(建模方法)。 RS和建模方法之间的比较表明,基于RS的结果可以更好地了解EP以及ES的细粒度空间分布,而建模方法则反映了支撑EP特质模型的土地利用信号。两种方法在20 m分辨率下的空间一致性对于单个生态系统而言在16%到22%之间变化,但是对于整个生态系统服务供应来说,它只有7%。此外,该建模方法将高寒草甸草地的土地利用类别确定为具有多个ES(热点)的高值区域,而割草的永久草地则为具有较低ES和仅几个ES(冷点)的区域。尽管基于RS的热点只是通过建模方法预测的热点的一小部分,但冷点却相当分散,与补丁结果重叠有限的小斑块。尽管评估活动的时间安排和现场数据要求受到限制,但RS为EP的空间连续映射提供了有价值的数据,因此可以提供ES的基于RS的代理。尽管RS方法仅适用于有限的区域和一种类型的生态系统,但我们相信,高保真机载和卫星RS数据的更广泛可用性将促进基于RS的ES对更大区域和其他生态系统的评估。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号